Helen intentionally chose the way of war for the sake of love. In respect to Helen it was beauty, when she was called “fair-tressed Helen” (Homer, 2007, p. In the contrast analysis of both heroines it is vital to mention that the predominant feature of Penelope was wisdom. Both women were under protection of gods, and their destinies were analyzed above every now and then. Here the demonstration of how woman’s beauty can be depicted in her attitudinal framework toward lovely men. In other words, she did it because she wanted to follow the intentions of Paris’s heart, first of all. In case of Helen love prospects are displayed in her great desire to be with Paris, notwithstanding the consequences of such “exodus”. Here love props up against the idea of a woman’s genuine nature to provide the continuation of generations along with her other half of life, meaning a man. However, in case of Penelope such implementation of love was at a distance while she was waiting for Odysseus. Penelope and Helen followed the real call of their hearts and tried to do everything for making their love improved with the presence of their significant others.
Moreover, her bonds with Odysseus were supported by their son Telemachus. In case of Penelope her faithfulness was seen from the beginning to the end of the story. In this respect both women are shown as able to love, but in case of Helen it is outlined that she left her real husband Menelaus for rather younger Paris. Their destinies are shown in a different coloring, though they were faithful toward their beloved men, Paris and Odysseus. Here is a remark that the author of the books made emphasis on the similarity with war and love reflected in the characters of Helen and Penelope. Both women became victims of love and war. However, Penelope was associated with wisdom, and everyone addressing her uses the epithet “wise Penelope” (Homer, 2009, p. Helen and Penelope were both beautiful and gorgeous for their appearance looked like a projection of goddess to men who surrounded them.
Which is, again, just really wild for a modern audience.First of all, both books are performed in a sequential order, so that to show the events which provoked Trojan War, its development, and time after the war when Odysseus wandered with his soldiers. He could have stayed, immortal, with Calypso, but his desire to return home is supposed to make us understand that he has kept an emotional loyalty to Penelope, even if he didn't keep a sexual loyalty to her. Odysseus demonstrates loyalty to Penelope and Ithaca by returning and restoring his palace to honor. It's really interesting to think about how our moral understanding of the characters has shifted over the last 3,000 years. But that theme- the value of loyalty to a master- doesn't resonate with a modern audience very well. The story keeps reminding us that if Penelope has remarried, Odysseus might be facing down the same fate as Agamemnon. Loyalty to an absent master is a HUGE theme in the second half of the Odyssey, between the Swineherd and the Dog, and yes, Penelope.
Even setting aside the fact that they are absolutely NOT in a position where they have any ability to consent to or refuse the suitors, but that they are executed for not being loyal to a master that they likely never met or barely remember, given that Odysseus is has been gone 20 years.
0 kommentar(er)
